Another day, another lawsuit. This time the plaintiffs argued that the IRS’s interpretation of the ACA was contrary to the statute, which, they asserted, authorizes tax credits only for individuals who purchase insurance on state-run exchanges, but not on federal exchanges. The court ruled “that the plain text of the statute, the statutory structure, and the statutory purpose make clear that Congress intended to make premium tax credits available on both state-run and federally-facilitated exchanges,” wrote U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman. “What little relevant legislative history exists further supports this conclusion and certainly—despite plaintiffs’ best efforts to suggest otherwise—it does not undermine it.”
Freedom isn’t free. It costs folks like you and me. If you don’t throw in your buck-oh-five, who will?
Big tax law changes rolled through in 2025 that impacted many taxpayers in either positive…
Federal tax returns, timely filing deadline is this Wednesday, April 15th, 2026. Tax returns needing additional time can e-file…
IRS has announced that they will begin funding Path Act-delayed returns with refunds containing refundable…
As tax season approaches, and tax adverts begin flooding the radio and tv, you may…
Professional tax software costs range from lower cost, a few hundred dollars, to very high…
Tax season for tax filing year 2025 is rumored to be starting late this year,…
This website uses cookies.