Another day, another lawsuit. This time the plaintiffs argued that the IRS’s interpretation of the ACA was contrary to the statute, which, they asserted, authorizes tax credits only for individuals who purchase insurance on state-run exchanges, but not on federal exchanges. The court ruled “that the plain text of the statute, the statutory structure, and the statutory purpose make clear that Congress intended to make premium tax credits available on both state-run and federally-facilitated exchanges,” wrote U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman. “What little relevant legislative history exists further supports this conclusion and certainly—despite plaintiffs’ best efforts to suggest otherwise—it does not undermine it.”
Freedom isn’t free. It costs folks like you and me. If you don’t throw in your buck-oh-five, who will?
Pricing is officially set for tax preparer registration for the coming 2010 tax year.
Comparing the positives and negatives of online vs. desktop tax preparation software.
IRS removes debt indicator from banks and software transmitters.
Paperwork requirements when making changes or corrections to clients rejected tax returns.
Use the disconnected youth tax credit to save your tax office payroll expenses this tax…
The IRS has released their changes relating to Flex Spending Accounts for the 2011 tax…
This website uses cookies.